Results matching “Texas” from Save St Mary's Malaga

The problem is that Megachurches promote and empty, consumerist spirituality that leaves no room for self-reflection. Or that's what they say.
-Some blog commenter named "Kylark"
coffee


Over at savestmarys, we do not enjoy having to deal with news pieces like this one, but really they make our job easier. This article profiles St. Joseph's "Catholic" McMegaChurch in Richardson, Texas, a church the bishop would like to replicate here in South Jersey.

About 1,500 miles away, officials at the Diocese of Camden want to promote this type of vibrant parish. As part of a planned diocesan makeover...
Here it is in black and white, guys. This is what we're in store for. A "makeover." Yippee! We, too can look just like that cool Church of the Future down in Texas. Wait'll you see what's in store for us lucky Catholics. New buildings with new ideas and new priorities...

 Ironically, in an effort to assuage the fears of Mr. and Miss Average Catholic In the Pews, the Courier Post has done a really good job of confirming that our worst fears about what Bishop Galante and Friends have up their sleeves are true. The prospect that Bishop Galante would want to replicate mega"churches" with labyrinths and cappuccino bars here in South Jersey is a repulsive thought. Why in the world he believes that by instituting flaky, liberal "spirit-trends," souls will be saved is beyond me. Promoting the culture of the world at a supposedly Catholic church and reveling in what one can only imagine constitutes a frequent lack of reverence is simply appalling. Yet the pastor at St. Joe's, Msgr. Fischer,  says,

When people come here, there's a level of energy. It's like walking into a mall at Christmas.

Huh? Is that supposed to make us want to go to this church? Is he off his nut? I for one would like to know the last time that Msgr. Fischer was actually at a mall at Christmastime. These are places that most sane people avoid like the plague. Unless, of course, he is referring to the buzz that certain CEOs might get around Christmastime at the prospect of people willingly parting with their hard-earned money only to get some useless trinkets and doo-dads to fill stockings and gift bags.

Problematic article? Yeah. (But since no one wants a church like that, he did our work for us!)

Our problem with the article? Well first of all, the article fails in the journalistic integrity department generally because it is a puff piece. It is nothing but a piece of advertising for Bishop Galante and Company, and if I was Jim Walsh I'd be embarrassed by the fact that I'd compromised my professional standards. The article does not attempt to promote a balanced view of the megachurch, dissenting opinions, or even a hint of a critical stance toward the Bishop Galante and his plans. (Wonder what in the world the Courier Post, or should we call it "The Other Catholic Star Herald," could be getting in return for this kind of coverage?)

Of course, plenty of scholarship is available on the pluses and minuses of the megachurch at this point, but not a one was touched by Jim Walsh of the CP. Here are a couple of scholars Mr. Walsh could have contacted. Quote from 2005 ABC piece:


Mega-churches are booming all over the country, not just in the South.

Scott Thumma, a theologian at Hartford Seminary, compares the phenomenon to shopping at a place like Wal-Mart.

"Just as if you go to a Wal-Mart, you can get all of your lists done in one place, it's sort of one-stop shopping for spirituality as well," Thumma said.

Randall Balmer, a theology professor at Barnard College in New York says [of mega-congregations], "It is in many ways consumerism run amok."

In contrast, here's a perfect example of more Courier Post pandering:

One more difference between the regions [South Jersey and Dallas, Texas]: Galante, who often draws angry protests with his controversial plans for parish mergers in the Camden diocese, is recalled with fondness at St. Joseph.

"You tell that bishop we miss him here," barked head usher Chuck Maltese of Wylie, Texas, a retired New York City policeman.


How funny is that? First he says we're "angry" protesters. Now why in the world should we be angry? Guess we're too hormonal again. Oh well! Maybe we should have just handed over the keys and deeds to our churches cuz Bishop asked nice and said he'd give us a latte.  (I like hazelnut, no whipped cream. Although I can't afford those kinds of fancy drinks myself!) Honestly, if barking head usher Chuck Maltese would like Bishop Galante back in Texas, I just know we in the Diocese of Camden would be only too happy to oblige. Heck, we'd pay his one-way fare back and he can bring along Ms. Vollmer and Msgr. McGrath for company, too. On us! First class all the way. (No plastic utensils, and real dishes.)

It's rather odd that the CP would make the claim that Bishop Galante is widely loved and missed in Texas considering we at savestmarys have received more than a few unsolicited emails from disgruntled Texans claiming Galante mangled their diocese in more ways than one. Could you imagine the sordid tales we'd hear if we actually bothered picking up the phone to initiate contact ourselves? We simply haven't gotten around to that yet, but we'd certainly appreciate hearing the stories of the Catholics in Texas who are still picking up the pieces.

Depressing, ain't it?

Aside from the article itself, it's just plain depressing that too many "Catholic" churches are are deviating from the Truth in that they are so susceptible to superficial novelties, and that some pastors and bishops are leading their sheep astray. However Jim Walsh makes finding flaws in this "model church" way too easy, and judging from the comments on the Courier Post website, no one seems to think of this church as something in any way desirable, nor are they buying the ridiculous stats spewed by the Diocese.

In holding up this parish Bishop Galante's true intentions become very clear. It seems he wants to dismiss Catholicism as we've known it and institute something utterly different in its place. Something worldly, something that resembles what's going on in many trendy evangelical protestant churches. Something that embraces aspects of extreme liberalism and new age-iness. Something that dumbs down and dilutes our faith. Something that appeals to no real Catholic.

Keeping up with the culture

From a 2005 ABC News article dealing with the new consumerist megachurches, a parent is quoted:

"You know, the culture is giving our kids a lot of fast-paced media and all different things that are moving along," she said. "Why can't the church keep up and do the same thing for our kids and for us?"
There's an easy answer for that one, actually. As Christians we are to be in the world but not of it. It is not the responsibility of the Church to keep pace with modern American culture. It is the responsibility of the Church to preach and teach the Good News of Jesus Christ, whether or not that conforms to our "lifestyle." How many times did Our Lord tell us that He and His Kingdom were not of this world (John 18:36)? Further in St. Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians (2:12-14):

Now we have received not the spirit of this world, but the Spirit that is of God; that we may know the things that are given us from God. Which things also we speak, not in the learned words of human wisdom; but in the doctrine of the Spirit, comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the sensual man perceiveth not these things that are of the Spirit of God; for it is foolishness to him, and he cannot understand, because it is spiritually examined.
How many times must we be exhorted not to conform ourselves to the things of this world, for it is passing, but God is eternal?

And be not conformed to this world; but be reformed in the newness of your mind, that you may prove what is the good, and the acceptable, and the perfect will of God. (Romans 12:2)

Love not the world, nor the things which are in the world. If any man love the world, the charity of the Father is not in him. (1John 2:15)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that includes lattes and biscotti.

A few interesting things about the church

Interior: If you check out the church's website and look at the pictures of the interior, you'll notice it's very spare and there are almost no paintings, statues, or images of the saints, holy angels, or the Blessed Mother at all. You can barely tell this hideously ugly and cold church is Catholic at all. Don't these "Stations of the Cross" look inviting? Is there even a figure of Christ on or near that cross? Who in the heck would want to "meditate" here? To each his own, I guess, but I just don't get it.

ugly stations

Cremation: Like the parishes in Florida (churches St. John the Evangelist and St. Agnes), St. Joe's seems to advocate the non-traditional practice of cremation, to the point of having something called a "Columbarium Wall" where ashes may be interred in little niches. It's pretty darn ugly. The Columbarium Wall surrounds the labyrinth. (For those of you who aren't aware, cremation is hugely popular among liberal eco-types because it takes up less space.)

columbarium
Screen shot from church website. The "Columbarium" is that round wall.
I have no idea what the pagoda thingy in the top picture is. Maybe it's just a pagoda. Who knows.

Music: The choir has a CD with the predictable David Haas and Marty Hogan emotional tripe, as well as a "Zulu" song. Yay! How multi-cultural of them. At least now all the Zulus in their parish will feel welcome.

Eastern Stuff: You'll be happy to know they also have "Thai Chi Chih" available.

Questionable Curricula: Interestingly, the catechetical materials they've chosen to use over there have been given a "yellow" or caution rating by catholicculture.org, who "recommend[s] that you avoid Why Catholic." Quote:

Philip Blosser provides a perfect summary when he worries that the program is "designed by revisionists whose devious aim is to use their small group approach to refract ecclesial focus, to undermine magisterial authority, to democratize the Catholic message, to continue the AmChurch decentralization of Catholic Church in America, to continue the process of protestantizing and revising the Church and detaching her from the only moorings she has in her own traditions. . . ."
"Barista MInistry" (Really, I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried): Not only does St. Joe's have a cappuccino bar, they have a page on their website dedicated to coffee.

 cappuccino bar
Doesn't this cappuccino and latte cafe just scream "church" to you?
And just look at all the young people it draws.

A Response from non-practicing Catholics

Here's where our coverage of this story will take a turn for the odd. Tonight after work I popped over to my younger sister's house to borrow a couple of Disney videos for my kids, to kiss my new baby niece, and to chat for a few minutes. About an hour later, as I was turning to leave, I just happened to mention this piece in the Courier Post about "a mega[Catholic] Church that the bishop seems to want to replicate here in South Jersey, which has a cappuccino bar."

Now keep in mind that my sister, who is 28, and her husband, who is 32, were both raised Catholic. But, not uncommonly, they are both completely non-practicing. My older niece, who has just begun first grade, has never even been baptized. Other than to attend the baptisms of my own children and the occasional funeral, to the best of my knowledge, she hasn't darkened the doorway of a church in at least five years. She has her own reasons, I know, but we don't talk much about them. The point is, we couldn't be more polar opposite on the religion issue, unless maybe she was a rabid atheist or something.

Without so much as the blink of an eye, the two of them--my sister and brother-in-law--went off. They found the prospect of what a church like this could be, could look like, could morph into, etc. absurd and funny. What struck me most about what follows is that the very audience Galante and Company is trying to entice--the lapsed Catholics, the young families,  professionals, etc.--are the very people who see right through all the crap. People like my sister and her husband, who don't like BS. If there was a possibility of ever being religious, they'd prefer their religion to not be mixed up in materialism. So I thought I'd share some of this [admittedly irreverent at times] rapid-fire back-and-forth between my sister and her husband with you, just to give you an idea of how truly ineffectual all this "nonsense" is. Honestly, I was laughing really hard. They definitely "got it," and with zero prompting by me.

Warning: Extreme Sarcasm Ahead!!!
The easily offended should not read, but if you want an idea of how "the world" thinks of all this ridiculousness, read on.


Brother-in-law, Fred: Cappuccino bar. You mean, like Starbuck's?
Me: "Well, yeah. I assume so. I've definitely heard of evangelical churches with actual Starbuck's inside. This church in Texas has a cappuccino bar."
F: "Well, before I pray, do I have to stand in line?"
Sister, B: "Do I get a receipt after I do my penance?"
F: "Is the holy water in a coin-operated 'spritz' dispenser?
Ya know, like those perfume things?"

pic

B: "Are there waiters going around with trays, like at a cocktail party, with hosts on them?"
F: "Is there a food court?"
Me: "I've heard that they also offer Zen meditation there."
F&B: Completely blank stares. F says, "In a Catholic church???"
Me: "They have a
labyrinth."
B: "Is
David Bowie gonna be there?"
Me: Hysterically laughing

pic

F: "Is there tax on my religion?"
F: "Ya know the people they're trying to impress? The people who go to church like once a year at Christmas. You know I have no problem with 'real' Catholics, ya know, the people who really practice and really believe in it. But those people who go once a year and then say that they're Catholic? What the hell, they're not really Catholic. It isn't going to make a bit of difference to those types anyway."
B: (Goes on...) "Do you have to put a quarter in the confessional to get the door to open? Do the hosts have an imprint of the Nike swoosh on them?"
F: "Does the organist have a tip jar? Does he take requests?"
B: "Do they have a virtual reality 'do your own mass,' or 'be your own pope' kinda thing? You know, eventually it'd be a drive-through church. You don't even have to get outta your car. You know, you go to the first window for confession, you go to the second window to get your penance, and the third window to get communion."
F: (He adds) "But you have to pay. This s--t ain't free."
F: "They could also have reclining pews, like Lazyboys. Hey, does the priest down there have a ponytail?"

Offensive? Maybe. But this is the road that Bishop Galante and those who think like him are heading down. Materialism and worldliness have no place in the Church. It appeals to no one with any real depth. And why should they try to go head-to-head with the evangelical protestant churches with coffee bars, chain restaurants, and edutainment for "worship?" Anyone who leaves the Bark of St. Peter for a church that offers such things either has no real understanding of the Faith, has deep disagreements with it, or just wants a place to hang out. Why compete with the superficiality offered elsewhere when what you've got is the Truth, whole and uncompromised?! Even my completely non-religious brother-in-law recognizes that you cannot go half-way with your faith. By his way of thinking, only "real" Catholics, whose churches lack silliness, are deserving of respect. I for one found this interesting, but not too surprising. Why waste your time with religion if what is offered in a church is also offered at the mall?

(And no, in case you were wondering, we don't need alcohol to have a laugh. We're naturally silly.)

Here are a few more reactions to the article today:
  • "Yeah, I'm sure that people were thinking, 'That's what's been missing from my church experience--cappuccino."
  • "If the mall is such a hoppin' place, maybe the diocese ought to open up its own chain store called, 'McCatholic.' Ya know, a one-stop religion shop."
To wrap things up

If ya really must walk a labyrinth--umm, sorry, I meant to say "the divine imprint birthed through the human psyche and passed down through the ages"--to connect with "that which is within" there's apparently one here at the Episcopalian church in Longport. Of course, just about any self-respecting Unitarian Universalist church would have a labyrinth, too. Take your pick. And probably the greatest lovers of the labyrinth, the pagans, are profiled here. Snippet:

Seventeen people stood around the center of the outdoor labyrinth at the Unitarian Universalist Congregation in Frederick Tuesday, ready to welcome the coming of the winter solstice. A hazy moon hung in the sky and distant lights from Frederick city lightened the darkness of the labyrinth -- a center circle marked in the ground with nine concentric rings circling it. Sea Raven, a Unitarian Universalist pagan, led the group in meditation as they walked around the labyrinth and sang to the beat of a drum...

Letter to the Editor

A Letter to the Editor in Today's Sunbeam

REASON TO HALT CHURCH PROPOSAL
 
Editor:
 
Bishop Galante's business dealings with a man who was recently arrested and charged with fraud in a scheme to buy church properties should be enough for a reprieve for all our Catholic Churches in Salem County and the rest of the Camden Diocese, including St. Joseph's in Woodstown.
 
If there is a shortage of priests, why is such a good and holy priest like Father Wilson of India leaving St. Joe's and the Camden Diocese to go to Texas?
 
BARBARA BYRNES
Pilesgrove 

Boston Globe Article

Beyond sad. A link to this article was forwarded to me by someone in Texas whose church continues to suffer as a result of Bishop Galante's time there. This article is about the Boston Archdiocese, however. Quote:

When developer Tony Pace had the chance to turn the 100-year-old former Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Ipswich into a luxury condo, he sought the blessing of a parish priest.
Read entire article here.


Via Fr. Romanowski, we recently received a letter from a Texas couple which briefly described what Bishop Galante did when he was down in Dallas, how devastating that has been, and how they are still dealing with the aftermath of his time there. They wished us all the best and assured us of their prayers in this struggle. Hopefully this will open up a line of communication and we thank them for reaching out to us.

Indeed we have already seen the patterns in other diocese, under other bishops who wish to similarly dismantle the Catholic Church and faith in their regions. However we have been certain that, given Bishop Galante's past actions in Texas, the reasons given to us in the Diocese of Camden for closing our churches and schools have nothing to do a priest shortage, demographic shifts, youth ministry, or any of the other rationales du jour. What we are witnessing is a program that has been instituted by Galante in other places and continues to be thrust upon the faithful in many other diocese throughout the country (Lansing, Pittsburgh, Boston, Scranton, and on and on).

This information was submitted to by email me for posting today:

From the Catholic Star Herald, May 15th, 2008:

...consultations are now taking place with parish representatives to determine pastoral needs before the naming in August of the priests who eventually will become pastors of merged parishes when the new parishes are formally established by decree (a timeline was published in the May 2 Catholic Star Herald showing the process).  Existing pastors will cease to be pastors when the decrees establishing the newly-merged parishes are promulgated. Until then, parish life will continue under the direction of the present pastor.

Also a timeline from the Catholic Star Herald:

1. April-Fall 2008

Parishes utilize "Coping with Change Together" resources beginning in spring 2008. For more information about parish resources that are available, see www.GatheringGodsGifts.org.

2. May 1-June 15, 2008                       

In advance of the naming of pastors for newly merged parishes, consultations will occur to determine the pastoral needs of parish communities that will merge or be open due to a pastor resignation. Representatives from the Priest Personnel Board and diocesan or parish staff will meet with eight to 10 representatives from the parishes (typically those who currently are on parish pastoral and finance councils) to determine the pastoral needs of the newly configured parish(es).

3. May 15, 2008                        

Pastors of parishes that will remain stand-alone or clustered and who choose not to continue in their present assignments are to indicate by May 15 their intention to resign at a date to be determined.

4. June 1, 2008                                   

The Vicar for Clergy publishes the list of parish openings and invites priests to indicate their preferences and to apply for available parish assignments.

5. July 15, 2008                       

Priests will have until July 15 to apply for open parishes.

6. Early August                                   

The Priest Personnel and Policy Board deliberates and consults with the individual priests involved and submits recommendations to Bishop Galante for his consideration.

7. Mid-August           

Bishop announces to parishioners the names of the priests who eventually will become pastors when the new parishes are established formally by decree. There will be much work to be done before that can happen, pastorally, canonically and administratively. When the parish has completed its work, Bishop Galante will issue the decree, at which time the new parish comes into existence.  Existing pastors de facto cease to be pastors when the decrees establishing the newly-merged parishes are promulgated.  Until then, current pastors continue their ministry to the people of their parishes.

8. Late August                       

The process of naming priests to open parishes occurs a second time to address the vacancies that will occur as a result of the assignments announced in mid-August. At this time, a list of parish openings will be published.  Priests will have until September 2 to apply for these openings. After deliberation by the Priest Personnel and Policy Board, recommendations will be forwarded to Bishop Galante for his consideration. The assignments for these openings are expected to be announced in late September.

And yet oddly, in an article dated May 28, from the Catholic Diocese of Arlington
Click here for link:

Bishop Ireton principal Fr. Matthew Hillyard, O.S.F.S, has been assigned as the Rector of the Cathedral parish in Camden, N.J., thus ending the presence of the Oblates of Saint Francis de Sales at Bishop Ireton High School."

The commenter who sent me this says:

More lies by Galante?  Another "process" where decisions have already been made, before anything meaningful has been done based on the consultations and before applications were even due for priests to apply for this position and before the priest personnel board has reviewed the applications and compared them to the needs of the new parish?  I'm not sure what a "rector" is, but I suspect it means he will be the new pastor, and if so this may be an opportunity to clearly show Galante for what he really is.

Julie now: Notice that in everything they talk about "process." As we were walking out of the "meeting" with Bishop Galante at St.Mary's the other night, I was very close to Kevin from the Council of Churches, who was speaking to "Sister" Marilyn vollmer, trying to get some answers out of her. He was asking her where this (consolidation) program came from and if they brought it with them from LA and Texas. She corrected him, "It's not a program, it's a process."

Pardon my French, but what a load of horse doodoo. Apparently Kevin wasn't buying it either because he followed up quickly and politely with, "Ok, then where'd the 'process' come from?" It was pretty darn funny. But why? Why do they insist on referring to this diocesan massacre as a "process?"

In the sense that it's a process by which they attempt to destroy us and make us less Catholic, one step at a time, I guess it is a process. But seriously, in saying that this is a "process," the diocesan bureaucrats are claiming there's no preconceived or premeditated "plan"... as if this "diocesan restructuring" has simply to do with this diocese and its "needs." In saying it's a "process," they claim that they're "listening" to the Holy Spirit, taking things a little at a time, and "listening" to all of us. This way when they steamroll us and bulldoze our churches they can claim that it was all done for us--for our own good-- because they listened to us. That they are only doing what they see as needed. How many times have we heard Bishop Galante say that his, "conscience would not allow [him] to do otherwise"?

In fact, this IS A PROGRAM
and it's one that other diocese and other bishops have instituted around the country. It's a program that attempts to destroy the Faith. They don't want us to connect the dots and realize what's going on: that they want to make us into the "Catholic-Style Community Churches." The other night at St.Mary's, I was surprised to hear the bishop come right out and admit that he was modeling the new churches on the Evangelical Protestant community churches he views as so "successful." He spoke of Gloucester County Community Church specifically.
(For their website click here. Notice their church is  less hidiously ugly than St. John's in Naples, FL.) Folks, this is happening all across the country--not just herein the Diocese of Camden. Have no doubt that there is an agenda here.

Well, don't believe the lies. Refuse and resist--speak out against the scheming of Bishop Galante and his "other bishop," "Sister" Marilyn vollmer. Insist you want to be Catholic and you don't want any of the liberal nonsense. Fight for your church and your faith. We must. It's what Christ calls us to do.

 

Bishop Galante, be advised: If you should choose to keep up this unholy battle to close the shrine parish of St. Mary's Malaga, you will have a tremendous uphill battle ahead of you. We will fight you all the way to Rome if that's what it takes. The pressure will not cease, it will only increase. We will use canon law and civil law to protect what is holy and True.

Warning: Plainspoken Julie below. Feel free to add you two cents about this evening!

Tonight, Bishop Joseph Galante visited our little church. It was packed to overflowing and people picketed out in the street. It was an impressive turnout, to say the least. Interestingly, Bishop Galante brought a whole cavalcade of people along with him, including Roberta Small and "Sister" Marilyn vollmer, commonly known around the diocesan offices and beyond as "the other bishop." (He brought her along with him from Texas when he came to NJ.) You'd never know she was a "religious." He also brought along Fr. Carmen Carlone, pastor of St. Joe's in Hammonton.

As an aside, I joined St. Joe's awhile ago even though I never, ever attend (except once a year for the Feast of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, and that's about all I can stand). I joined hoping that I might be able to request "as a parishioner," that they offer Eucharistic adoration there. While I'm no longer a member there (and was in name only--the "liturgies" there were that appalling), when I attended the "welcome to the parish" event "Father" Carmen sported a salmon pink tank top, capris, and leather thong sandals. He's a real character. I have never seen him in a collar, actually, until tonight. He must've had that suit specially dusted off and pressed for the occasion. He looked good. But I digress.

The bishop and Msgr. Joyce, the slick moderator with the shiny shoes, gave us "one hour and ten minutes," with 2 minutes per person, to say our piece. Lots of incredible things were said, I couldn't even hope to repeat them all here. There was so much courage and conviction in the room, and lots of applause for points well-made. If the bishop got nothing else from our meeting, he must know this: that we are not, I repeat NOT going to give up until we obtain victory not just for St. Mary's, but for Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament who must be so outraged and offended by the actions of this bishop.

Friends of St. Mary's, let the Blessed Sacrament be at the very center of our struggle. So many tonight spoke to the bishop about their love of the Blessed Sacrament. Several children spoke about their experiences at Eucharistic adoration, and one girl who looked to be about ten said that she'd gone to adoration at 3AM this past night for the sake of our church, and walked off in tears. One little boy of about eight told the bishop he wanted to be a priest at St. Mary's! One man, who does not drive, takes the bus all the way from Margate to attend St.Mary's and to go to adoration there. How inspiring. And he wasn't the only one. Person after person stood up and said how far they go to get to St. Mary's and how they pass this church and that one because what St. Mary's has is truly special. And yet to the bishop, the level of commitment and love for the Lord that exists at St. Mary's is simply not "vibrant" enough.

I myself witnessed to the bishop of the heresy preached on the website of the parish of St. John the Evangelist, the millionaire South Florida church he holds up as the model he believes South Jersey churches should become. At St. John the Evangelist, they believe that the bread and wine remain after the consecration as the Lutherans do and as the Council of Trent condemned. That's called consubstantiation. It's heresy. He just sat there smugly and shook his head at me. But I spoke the truth, and he knows it. The truth cannot and must not be hidden!

One wonderful woman spoke with such conviction about the fact that clearly, this whole thing must be about money, and that we must withhold our money from the diocese if they won't listen to us. They're our churches, we've paid for them, and they want to take them away from us anyway. I completely agree with her--I will not give a dime until St. Mary's is safe.

The bishop admitted that the "community church" model of megachurch that attracts many people--you know, that lukewarm, happy clappy, superficial religion--should be what we model our future churches on. Boy does he have it all wrong. He thinks Catholics are going over to the evangelicals because they want to be entertained. He's wrong. They are seeking out truth and not hypocrisy. I question whether they find it there in those sorts of churches, of course, but I understand what they're looking for. Bishop Galante expressed that he thinks "young people" want a paid youth minister and all sorts of services and "ministries"--all the "ministry" money can buy. He's wrong. The bishop couldn't be more wrong. Youth want the Truth, pure and simple. They want to be real Catholics, not sugar-coated, watered-down ones. And if they can't be that or do not know how to be that, they're going to leave. More of the same old crap that they've been feeding us over the past 40 years isn't going to make the situation better, it's going to make it worse. Non-practicing Catholics (including a sibling of mine) are completely disgusted by this whole situation. Closing the churches that are their last remaining physical connections to the Catholic faith will only distance them further.

When Bishop Galante had the opportunity to speak at the end (and some of the points he made I've mentioned above), he was extremely unconvincing. It was really just the same stuff he's been saying for months, so no surprises there. However, he may have been surprised by our allergic reaction to his remarks and the continual interjections from the peanut gallery (myself included, I was very hot under the collar). His rationale is completely nonsensical and we all saw through it tonight. It was wonderful that he impressed, convinced, or persuaded no one. We were truly united as a community, a thing Galante supposedly seeks to encourage--by tearing down our churches and building up artificial communities. He came in knowing he had his own plans and that he would not truly listen to us. The whole thing was for show, really, just to pretend he actually cares, just like the "speak up sessions." None of us fell for it.

In a nutshell, Bishop Galante is still claiming there will be a priest shortage, that Catholics are not attending mass, that churches need to be open seven days a week, "vibrant" liturgies need to happen everywhere (whatever the hell that means--I guess holy, Catholic liturgies are less important), that we need to have peppier music, and that outreach is centrally important. Of course, all of us sitting in the pews, in answer to every point he made about how the churches need to change, said, "we ARE doing that." St. Mary's is open all the time. It is "vibrant" liturgically, it does do outreach (but in a personal rather than a "slick" sort of way), and does have authentic, Catholic music.

The bishop also stood up and shamefully lied about several things, such as the financial motivation. He said that the assets of a parish, once merged, remain within the new entity. He failed to mentioned all the money grabbing that would occur after the "merge" (closure) and his power to control said assets. He failed to address several questions posed by the parishioners, including one very important one posed by Leah Vassallo, which was, basically, "What could St. Mary's do to demonstrate its 'vibrancy' to you, Bishop? Do you even think it's possible for a small church community of about 250 families, such as ours, to be vibrant?" After the bishop finished speaking (after having been interrupted numerous times by the faithful in the pews), Leah demanded he answer her question, and he completely ignored her. But in a way, I think he did answer her question. He talked about nothing but numbers and "big" churches, paid ministries, and bringing in masses of people. (Of course, when you close all these churches the megachurches will have to be large and bustling--they'll be the only places left to go! May God spare us that abomination!) While he conceded that even large churches could fail to be vibrant, the definite implication was that this was an exception. Big=vibrant to the bishop.

Bishop Galante was also confronted about his use of the name "Wawa" to refer to our little churches. Wonderfully, the speaker, our cameraman and a self-identified "Catholic in name only" and "doubting Thomas," said that Wawa was so successful because "there's one on every corner" and you can easily find them! Also, you always know you can get good food there and good service. Haha! What a wonderful point. Perhaps we should claim the term "Wawa church." As in, "My church is a Wawa church! You can find St. Mary's always open on the corner of 40 & 47!"

Finally I ought to mention that Bishop Galante stated that he could have come to this diocese and had an easy last few years before retirement, to which all of us applauded and said, "Why don't you?!" He was not happy with this remark and several times over admonished us to act as Christians. Last time I checked, it's our job as Christians to stand up and tell the truth. "Nicey-nice" ain't synonymous with Christian. But again, I digress. Anyway, the bishop said his "conscience wouldn't allow him" to keep things as they are, the "status quo" as he calls it.

As the days go on, Friends of St. Mary's, I am increasingly convicted. I know that we are doing the right thing, that God is on our side, and that we are doing His will. And the more unsavory information I learn of the bishop and his past, the more I realize that something unholy is afoot. We must continue to pray for the bishop, for nothing is impossible with God, and for the priests of our diocese. And let us keep working to save A Light in the Diocese: St. Mary's!

(PS: My four-year-old son Theo would like to add, "St. Mary's is a special church." He typed that himself.)





Friends of St. Mary's Malaga: Please email me, call me, comment here, or send letters detailing your experiences of this evening and opinion of the bishop's scheme. Feel free to comment below.


for article click here

The article was written by Rod Dreher, of CruncyCon, which covers "conservative politics and religion." The piece is excellent. For the remainder of the piece, go directly to Mr. Dreher's website.

This is, of course, old news, since it dates from when Galante was in Texas. But this article is recent. And it begs the question, at least in my own mind, what's Bishop Galante up to here? Who's he protecting in our own diocese? Mr. Dreher says:

I spoke the other day to Steve Sandifer, a lawyer and Catholic layman in Lancaster, a southern Dallas suburb, who had been received into the Church by Fr. Art Mallinson. Shortly thereafter, Sandifer said he learned about Fr. Mallinson's involvement in the lewd, semi-pornographic St. Sebastian's Angels website. Scandalized, Sandifer went straight to Bishop Joseph Galante, at the time the coadjutor bishop in Dallas, to register his shock and anger. This was 2002.

Sandifer told me that Bp Galante assured him their conversation would be in confidence. Sandifer alleges that when he explained his objections about St. Sebastian's Angels to the bishop, that Bp Galante defended Fr. Mallinson, and said the priest hadn't done anything wrong. Sandifer claims that the bishop further said that Fr. Mallinson had assured him that he was no longer part of that site, and that was that. The bishop allegedly told the new convert that he was, in Sandifer's words, "making a mountain out of a molehill."

Not satisfied with this, Sandifer went to Fr. Mallinson's rectory to confront him. Sandifer said Mallinson greeted him by saying, "I've been expecting you. Bishop Galante told me you'd spoken with him."

I contacted Bishop Galante's office in Camden, NJ, and through a spokesman asked the bishop for comment on Sandifer's allegations. I also told the spokesman I wanted to know why Bishop Galante chose to leave Fr. Mallinson in the parish after his involvement with St. Sebastian's Angels became a public scandal (other bishops removed their SSA priests from ministry). I heard back from the diocesan spokesman today. He said, "The bishop doesn't believe it would be appropriate to speak on a personnel matter that's before another diocese."

...

Laymen did complain, over and over. And it did them no good. They were told that they were the ones with the problem.


Another article from July 19, 2002 is here:

From Seattle Catholic

The article ends with this excellent quote:

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it." -Pope St. Felix III


I do not recommend it, but in the event that you doubt that this gay priest website existed, here's a link to the archive of it: "st. sebastian's angels" site Again let me reiterate that this site is OFFENSIVE and DISGUSTING, but I link her only to prove the site did in fact exist and to highlight just what Bishop Galante had tolerated when he was in TX. There is plenty of warning when you go to the site, before proceeding, that the site you are about to enter is offensive. A Catholic watchdog sort of group has it up on their page at the moment as evidence of the scandal.






Press Release 5/8/08

"For Immediate Release"

May 08, 2008

From The Council of Parishes of Southern New Jersey

In the fall of 2007, when the planning initiative to reduce the number of parishes in the Camden Diocese from the current 124 parishes to 66 parishes was announced, Bishop Galante stated, "We are saved as a people; we will plan as a people." However, parishes were denied the opportunity to present any alternatives which had not been reviewed by the Diocese Planning Commission in September 2007. Many parishioners felt they were also denied their rights to appeal the bishop's decision to merge and/or close their parishes.

Therefore, in May 2008, the Council of Parishes of Southern New Jersey was formed. The Council, currently representing approximately 15 parishes throughout the Diocese of Camden, opposes the unnecessary and harmful merge of our parishes and closure of our churches. In the Diocese of Camden, we do not have a current priest shortage and in the event of a future priest shortage, other options are available to allow our vibrant parishes to remain open. One example, initiated by Our Lady Queen of Peace Parish in Pitman, involved recruiting foreign priests. Congregation Superiors from the Carmelites of Mary Immaculate in India visited the parish and agreed to provide several priests to serve the population. The Bishop is familiar with this Priestly Congregation and had them serve the Beaumont, Texas Diocese where he was previously a Bishop. He currently has two priests from this Congregation serving in the Camden Diocese. He did not respond or comment on the worthiness of this proposal at the time it was presented in October 2007 and this option was subsequently denied. Other practical options have likewise been rejected without explanation.

Furthermore there are no serious financial difficulties in the Diocese or in the vast majority of the parishes within the Diocese. Rather the Bishop is determined to close our smaller parishes, which he has referred to as Wawas with crosses, because he prefers megachurches. However, there is no evidence that megachurches in any way will increase the percentage of Catholics who attend Mass. In fact, the opposite has been shown to be true.

Contact information for the Council of Parishes of Southern New Jersey:

Leah Vassallo email 856-692-0222
Nicholas Nastasi email 609-972-4570
Robert Walsh email 856-582-2192
Corine Robinson email 609-425-4324
Kevin Kelton 856-694-2748

Support the Campaign!

Why Save St. Mary's?

What's true for OL Queen of Peace, Pitman & Assumption, Wildwood Crest is also true for St. Mary's Malaga:

"The people in Pitman bought that ground and built that church and it belongs to them. You can't just take it away."

-Anthony Mecca, Queen of Peace Parish, Pitman (also on the slate for closure), May 8, 2008

"This is God's house. Let us live here with God as we've done all these years."

-Fred Spiewak, Assumption Parish, Wildwood Crest, June 11, 2008

Frequently Asked Questions

Full list of Frequently Asked Questions about the Church Closings

Recent Entries

How Big is "Big Enough?"
We have had lots of reasons, all of which we have previously debunked, (including the priest shortage lie,*) thrown at…
St. Mary's Continues to Resist Merger!
Make no mistake about it. St. Mary's parishioners continue to resist the merger and subsequent closure of their church. Why?…
Wildwood Catholic HS to Stay Open
Wildwood Catholic HS will remain open thanks to the efforts of those who worked to save it. The diocesan spin…

Email Signup

Sign up for daily email updates about the campaign.

Enter your email address:

Facebook

Twitter: Savestmarys

Confidential Tip Line

We would like to announce our totally confidential tip line, for anyone with information pertaining to St. Mary's or their own parish, dealings with the diocese, etc. Remember, you need not give your name, or you may if you choose to. Contact us by email: info@savestmarys.net or phone: 856-692-0222 (ask for Leah).